Who won here? – Part 2

Posted: November 7th, 2014 | Author: | Filed under: HIV | 1 Comment »

In my recent post, I commented on the following video:

I provided an answer to the doctor’s question, “If there was a vaccine for HIV that reduced the rate by 50%, would you be okay or would you be protesting?” In discussing the post with a friend, he offered an excellent follow-up to this. The doctor should answer this question: If there was a vaccine for HIV that reduced the rate by 50%, would you be okay or would you continue advocating for circumcision?


One Comment on “Who won here? – Part 2”

  1. 1 Joseph4GI said at 1:58 pm on November 10th, 2014:

    Another question the doctor should be asked is whether or not he’d start performing female circumcision in baby girls if “new research showed” it prevented HIV and vulvar cancer.

    http://hivinkenya.blogspot.jp/2014/07/why-reducing-hiv-transmission-must.html


Leave a Reply

  • *