8/12/14 Edit: I’ve edited the links in this post because the html was broken. All content remains unchanged.
Disclaimer: Based on what I documented in my last post, I’m unconvinced this disclaimer will be noted or accurately represented by paper0airplane, but I write it with the common usage of the words: The behavior in the linked screenshots is deplorable. It isnâ€™t something I support.
I asked for evidence to support paper0airplaneâ€™s accusation that a “prominent intactivist â€¦ has decided to set up a database of circumcised boys.” I said it was deplorable and that â€œ[m]y guess is that itâ€™s true,â€ while asking for a source. That was a simple demand that brought a ridiculous response (that didnâ€™t source direct criticism with a link to my post). That response, addressed here, included this in a comment:
â€¦ Itâ€™s not a problem to provide their sources. However, I am pretty sure that even if I were to, that fact wouldnâ€™t make it into the blog post.
In what I presume is a passive-aggressive challenge, paper0airplane posted two screenshots to support part of the original claim. I encourage you to review them. Theyâ€™re repugnant and deplorable. Learn from them what the behavior of an ass can include.
I, of course, expect it to be completely obvious that my original point stands. It is not appropriate to assign the bad behavior of a person to every person who shares a nominal goal. I expect paper0airplaneâ€™s behavior in this series of posts to reflect only on paper0airplane, and not well. But anyone else who also incorrectly believes parental choice is legitimate for non-therapeutic child circumcision is not responsible for paper0airplane. I expect the same basic courtesy, which reflects my belief that people are individuals first.
For the record, I do not know the person mentioned in the screenshots, as I wrote twice, nor am I aware of any alias Facebook accounts she might use. I do not use Facebook for my activism.
As for the database mentioned in the screenshots, I have questions.
- Iâ€™m with paper0airplaneâ€™s point from the original post. Why? This database doesnâ€™t achieve anything toward ending the practice of non-therapeutic child circumcision.
- Where is she getting her data? Medical records are private. HIPAA is supposed to protect this data. Is it collected from what people post publicly on Facebook?
- Is there evidence that this website exists or is under construction? Is there a URL? Is it “merely” pointless, damaging trolling?
The comments in the screenshots arenâ€™t dated, so I donâ€™t know when they occurred. Also, this doesnâ€™t provide evidence that the person was arrested for harassment.