Mike Gatto has fans. Mike Gatto is still wrong about circumcision.

Posted: July 30th, 2014 | Author: | Filed under: Ethics, FCD | 6 Comments »

I’m still convinced he’s probably doing nothing more than a form of weird trolling, but I’m still fascinated by what Daulton Gatto is doing with this. Yesterday I got two posts, including my promised addition to the “enemies” list. It’s as ridiculous as I expected. Awesome.

First, BREAKING NEWS: Mike Gatto Has a New Enemy, and His Name Is, uh, “Tony”:

Our blog’s loyal readers will be familiar with the antics of “Tony,” another incoherent babbling lunatic who lives in a bizarre fantasy world where Mike Gatto supports genital mutilation. Well, as you can see in the next two links, Tony insists on posting cowardly pingbacks to my brilliant and devastatingly well-reasoned critiques of his stupid arguments which claim to show that Mike Gatto likes to cut up baby boys’ wieners with surgical instruments.


My earlier points about ad hominem apply again, above and on the “enemies” list post. What I really enjoy, though, is that my “stupid arguments claim to show” something I have not written or implied. I do not believe “Mike Gatto likes to cut up baby boys’ wieners with surgical instruments.” Why do you state my claim as something unconnected to what I’ve written? Is it poor reading comprehension? Is it willful misrepresentation? Maybe it’s just lazy trolling? I’m curious and don’t want to assume an answer, but there is an explanation for why you’re punching a strawman. What is it?

With AB768, Mike Gatto introduced legislation stating that male circumcision in California can only be regulated at the state level. AB768 protects the practice of male circumcision and the exercise of parental authority to have a child circumcised for any reason throughout California. I stated that he believes male minors do not have the same rights to their bodies as every other citizen of California. I don’t even assume that he and his wife would have any sons circumcised. Maybe they would, maybe they wouldn’t. But he incorrectly believes he and every other parent has the valid authority to choose, and, in his capacity as a legislator, to protect that authority in law.

The flaw is easy enough to understand. AB768 does not include critical information about the risks, harms, and ethics of non-therapeutic child circumcision. The practice of male circumcision involves individual human rights. If this parental authority to impose non-therapeutic genital cutting were legitimate, it would apply to their daughters, as well. California already prohibits this, correctly. AB768 permits the violation of human and constitutional rights of California citizens. Mike Gatto should not have introduced it. No one should’ve voted for it. Gov. Brown should not have signed it.


True to his word, he added me to his enemies list. The last paragraph introduces an amusing assumption about what I believe based on what I wrote.

6 Comments on “Mike Gatto has fans. Mike Gatto is still wrong about circumcision.”

  1. 1 Daulton Gatto said at 6:12 pm on July 30th, 2014:

    Stop being a pussy.

    The way forward:


  2. 2 Daulton Gatto said at 7:33 am on August 3rd, 2014:

    Here you go, Tony:


  3. 3 Tony Asks, “Why do you state my claim as something unconnected to what I’ve written?” Daulton Answers. | said at 7:39 am on August 3rd, 2014:

    […] Tony states: […]

  4. 4 Choose Intact » Blog Archive » Flawed Circumcision Defense: The indecipherability of “ga ga goo goo ooga bahfah fum” said at 10:16 am on August 3rd, 2014:

    […] Gatto asked to interview me. I agreed on the condition that he first answer a question from my last post. In response to Daulton’s alleged critiques of my “stupid arguments which claim to show […]

  5. 5 Daulton Gatto said at 2:56 am on August 13th, 2014:

    I apologize for the delay. I’ve been recovering from an accident.


  6. 6 Daulton Gatto said at 2:57 am on August 13th, 2014:

    Here are your interview questions:


    Our readers are most anxious to hear your point of view. Your answers will be posted unedited.

Leave a Reply

  • *